|
| 
enlarge
| Brand: Luvable Friends Category: Baby Product
This item is no longer available
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 6-10 of 13
You Get What you Pay for November 12, 2007 UES 2 out of 2 found this review helpful
I bought this set of five onesies for my daughter, at the same time I bought some pricier ones for her at cafepress. These ones shrunk after the first wash and in some cases you couldn't read what was written in them anymore. The more expensive ones are still the same size and color. Obviously, you get what you pay for.
Very cute October 10, 2007 Cathy (Los Angeles, CA) These are really cute. VERY THIN. so not for cold weather. and they run big. My toddler has grown out of even 18 month clothes of some manufacturers and these are still big on him (18mos). So plan for not shrinking, and bigger than you think.
Bodysuits September 7, 2007 L. J. Mutchek (Benton, IL) The packaging the bodysuits come in smells real strong of rubber but the smell does come out of the bodysuits once they are washed. The writing is very small to read, I would expected the lettering to be a bit larger and the sizing is a little off. The 12 month size compares to an 18 month size in comparable brands. Overall a fair product but I would not purchase again.
They shrink and the arm holes are too small June 30, 2007 Sweet Valley High (Newport Beach, CA) 3 out of 3 found this review helpful
These were the right size for my baby...until I washed them once. They shrank! Also, the armholes are tight on my baby (He is 6 months, wearing a 12 month size. Mind you he is in the 97th percentile in height and weight, so he is a big baby, but more tall than wide). I no longer want to even use these because they are too small after one washing. They still technically fit, but they are tight and do not look comfortable in the crotch area. One good thing: the hole for the head is nice and wide.
Nice fit...very soft April 26, 2007 Shannon , NJ 2 out of 3 found this review helpful
1- These are very soft 2- Are a little on the wide side...longer length would have been preferred.
|
|
| Copyright 2008 | |